Skip to main content
· 4/17/2014

Robert Grimes v. District of Columbia Business Decisions Information, Inc., Welton Williams

Citations

  • 89 A.3d 107
  • 29 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1165
  • 2014 WL 1491761
  • 2014 D.C. App. LEXIS 104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing IIED claim in which an employer allegedly “investigated [plaintiff], wrote a false report, and published that report to others” in retaliation for seeking disability benefits
  • “We see no unfairness in affirming on the [stated] ground . . . because Mr. Grimes briefed that issue in this court and in the trial court.”
  • “Where there will be no procedural unfairness, we may affirm a judgment on any valid ground, even if that ground was not relied upon by the trial judge . . . .” (internal quotation omitted)
  • declining to address issue that was not briefed on appeal
  • upholding dismissal of a complaint on this ground

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glickman, Blackburne-Rigsby, McLeese

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.