· 4/17/2014
Robert Grimes v. District of Columbia Business Decisions Information, Inc., Welton Williams
Citations
- 89 A.3d 107
- 29 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1165
- 2014 WL 1491761
- 2014 D.C. App. LEXIS 104
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing IIED claim in which an employer allegedly “investigated [plaintiff], wrote a false report, and published that report to others” in retaliation for seeking disability benefits
- “We see no unfairness in affirming on the [stated] ground . . . because Mr. Grimes briefed that issue in this court and in the trial court.”
- “Where there will be no procedural unfairness, we may affirm a judgment on any valid ground, even if that ground was not relied upon by the trial judge . . . .” (internal quotation omitted)
- declining to address issue that was not briefed on appeal
- upholding dismissal of a complaint on this ground
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Glickman, Blackburne-Rigsby, McLeese
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.