Robert G. Tilton, an Individual v. Gary L. Richardson, Ole Anthony, Harry Guetzlaff, C. Tony Wright, David Burrows, and George A. Otstott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the same elements are required for S 1985(3) claims against private actors
• holding that “an RFC that fails to take into account a claimant’s 7 limitations is defective”
• holding that the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments “do not erect a shield against merely private conduct however discriminating or wrongful”
• holding that when the wife’s “testimony was similar to 7 [claimant’s] complaints” and the ALJ properly rejected claimant’s testimony, “it follows 8 ||that the ALJ also gave germane reasons for rejecting [the wife’s] testimony”
• holding that the same elements are required forS1985(3) claims against private actors
• § 1985(3) applies “only to conspiracies motivated by some racial, or perhaps otherwise class-based, invidiously discriminatory animus”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).