Robert Frederick Huff v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under Rule 29, a defendant was not required to specify the grounds in a motion for a judgment of acquittal other than to state that the motion was on the ground the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction
• lay witness opined on specific legal nature of the goods at issue
• testimony by government customs inspector concerning \commercial\ nature of imported goods
• testimony by government customs inspector concerning “commercial” nature of imported goods
• lay witness opined on specific legal nature of the goods at issue
• lay witness opined on specific legal nature of the goods at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).