Robert Fountain v. Robert A. McDonald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Board erred in not adequately explaining several putative discrepancies between the appellant’s lay statements and the other evidence of record
• concluding that the Board erred in not adequately explaining several putative discrepancies between the appellant’s lay statements and the other evidence of record
• concluding that the Board erred in not adequately explaining several putative discrepancies between the appellant's lay statements and the other evidence of record
• holding that the absence of a record documenting the fact at issue only weighs against the claim if the fact would ordinarily have been recorded
• holding that the presumptive provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 3.309(a) include tinnitus as an organic disease of the nervous system where there is evidence of acoustic trauma
• holding that where there is evidence of acoustic trauma, the presumptive provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 3.309(a) include tinnitus as an organic disease of the nervous system

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).