Robert FISHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that remand is inappropriate unless there is reason to believe that remand would lead to a different result
• holding that “[n]o principle of administrative law or common sense requires us to remand a case in quest of a perfect opinion unless there is reason to believe that the remand might lead to a different result”
• holding remand is not required unless there is reason to believe that it might lead to a different result
• noting that “hallmark of light exertion work is that it ‘requires a good deal of walking or standing - the primary difference between sedentary and most light jobs’” (emphasis supplied by Plaintiff
• stating that “[n]o principle of administrative law or common sense requires [a court] to remand a case . . . unless there is reason to believe that the remand might lead to a different result”
• observing that “[n]o principle of administrative law or common sense requires us to remand a case in quest of a perfect opinion unless there is reason to believe that the remand might lead to a different result”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).