Robert Filus v. Michael Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ALJ may rely on a reviewing doctor’s opinion that is not contradicted by any medical source.
• holding that ALJ did not err in accepting agency opinions when no other physician contradicted then
• concluding that, where no physician contradicted state agency reviewing physicians’ opinions that plaintiff did not meet or medically equal any listed impairment, ALJ did not err in accepting them
• finding that state agency physicians’ opinions that a claimant did not meet or medically equal any listed impairment constituted substantial evidence supporting the ALJ’s conclusion
• finding that State Agency physicians’ opinions that a claimant did not meet or medically equal any listed impairment constituted substantial evidence supporting the ALJ’s conclusion
• finding that state agency physicians’ opinions that a claimant did not meet or medically equal any listed impairment constituted substantial evidence supporting the ALJ’s conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).