Skip to main content
· 2/3/1992

Robert F. Kornacki, D/B/A Robert Kornacki & Associates v. Norton Performance Plastics

Citations

  • 956 F.2d 129
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1251
  • 1992 WL 15326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting dealer status where the plaintiff “occasionally made rush deliveries, [defendant] shipped most products directly to customers”
  • rejecting dealer status despite investment by plaintiff in advertising for defendant
  • “Kornaeki has spent a long time developing customers for Norton and its predecessor, Halogen Insulator & Seal Corporation — he began representing Halogen in 1955. This kind of good will, however, is not enough to make Kornaeki a dealer under the WFDL.”
  • sales agent who did not have power to bind the grantor and who had not made a substantial capital investment specific to the grantor was not a dealer under WFDL, even though 75-85% of his No. 05-1074 7 revenue came from selling the grantor’s products

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Cudahy, Will

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.