Skip to main content
· 8/31/2007

Robert F. Ford, Jr. v. Exxon Mobil Chemical Company, a Division of Exxonmobil Corporation

Citations

  • 235 S.W.3d 615
  • 50 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1191
  • 168 Oil & Gas Rep. 318
  • 2007 Tex. LEXIS 798
  • 2007 WL 2457755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that actions seeking to set aside voidable deeds are required to be filed no later than four years after the cause of action accrues
  • noting that when a deed is merely voidable, equity will not intervene because claimant has an adequate remedy at law
  • noting that when a deed is merely voidable, equity will not intervene because claimant has an adequate remedy at law
  • noting that when a deed is merely voidable, equity will not intervene because claimant has an adequate remedy at law
  • holding action to set aside voidable deed for fraud or at equity is governed by four-year statute of limitations
  • providing that Texas law with respect to challenging the validity of a deed “is well settled that once limitations has expired for setting aside a deed for fraud, that bar cannot be evaded by simply asserting the claim in equity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Neill, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.