Robert Excell White v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “if the [S]tate’s admission of psychiatric testimony is subject to harmless-error analysis, then the purported Ake error is likewise subject to harmless-error analysis”
• holding that showing of an entitlement to psychiatric assistance on the sole basis that the State intended to present expert testimony was subject only to harmless error review.
• holding that an Ake violation was subject to harmless error analysis
• explaining that harmlessness of Ake 11 error precluded finding of Strickland prejudice
• “Three other circuits have expressly concluded that Ake error is subject to harmless-error analysis, and we now join them.”
• “Three other circuits have expressly concluded that Ake error is subject to harmless-error analysis, and we now join them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).