ROBERT EARL REEVES v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Communication Act’s public interest standard is sufficiently definite to overcome a challenge under the nondelegation doctrine
• holding that because radio is a medium with inherent limitations and everyone who might seek to broadcast cannot, the “right of free speech does not include ... the right to use the facilities of radio without a license”
• holding that, because radio has \unique characteristic[s]\ that prevent its being made available to all who might seek to broadcast, the \right of free speech does not include . . . the right to use the facilities of radio without a license\
• holding that, because radio has “unique eharacteristiefs]” that prevent its being made available to all who might seek to broadcast, the “right of free speech does not include ... the right to use the facilities of radio without a license”
• upholding delegation to Federal Communications Commission to regulate broadcast licensing “as public interest, convenience, or necessity” require
• upholding delegation to the Federal Communications Commission to regulate radio broadcasting according to “public interest, convenience, or necessity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).