Robert E. Morris and Carol L. Morris v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a regulatory takings claim was unripe where the landowners had not yet applied for a permit that would have allowed them to harvest redwood trees on their property
• stating that the Court of Federal Claims “does not have jurisdiction over [takings] claims that are not ripe!’
• holding takings claim not ripe when plaintiff failed to file permit request with Corps, stating therefore, .“there has been no final agency decision”
• explaining that the Court of Federal Claims “does not have jurisdiction over claims that are not ripe”
• explaining that the Court of Federal Claims “does not have jurisdiction over claims that are not ripe”
• outlining that this exception serves as a means for avoiding multiple subsequent applications after it is clear from one final judgment that no project will be approved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).