Skip to main content
· 4/2/1965

Robert E. Lynch, Fred Hoffman and Phyllis Klein v. John R. Torquato, Edna Lugar and Virgil Moraca

Citations

  • 343 F.2d 370
  • 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6040

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the citizen’s constitutional right . . . to [] choo[se] . . . who shall be his elected representatives in the conduct of government” is not a matter or legal issue that falls within “the internal management of a political party”
  • “this lawsuit appears to be an effort ... to wrest control of ordinary party affairs from present leadership rather than an attempt to vindi cate the plaintiffs’ [constitutional] right[s].... ”
  • “Whether the equalitarian requirement of the Fourteenth Amendment extends to procedural alternatives of primary elections, and particularly to such post-primary emergency nominations . . ., may well be doubted.”
  • no state action in party’s internal affairs ; candidate-nomination question left open
  • one person, one vote inapplicable to selection of party’s county committees
  • one person, one vote inapplicable to selection of party's county committees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLaughlin, Staley, Hastie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.