Robert E. Disch v. Faye F. Rasmussen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a bankruptcy court can “reopen an order of discharge for one of the reasons recognized by Bankruptcy Rule 9024” even where the conditions specified in § 727(d) are not present
• reviewing bankruptcy court’s ruling granting leave to amend to add a Section 727(a) claim for abuse of discretion
• reiterating requirement of fraudulent intent or deceit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).