· 8/27/2001
Robert E. Alexander v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services, Susan Moritz, Claire Nagel
Citations
- 263 F.3d 673
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19188
- 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,769
- 86 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1177
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that there is no heightened summary judgment standard in the employment dis- crimination context
- stating that the court’s only inquiry in reviewing a grant of summary judgment is “whether the plaintiff has provided evidence from which a rational trier of fact could infer that the employer’s stated reasons for taking the adverse action were lies.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wood, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.