Skip to main content
· 8/27/2001

Robert E. Alexander v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services, Susan Moritz, Claire Nagel

Citations

  • 263 F.3d 673
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19188
  • 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,769
  • 86 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that there is no heightened summary judgment standard in the employment dis- crimination context
  • stating that the court’s only inquiry in reviewing a grant of summary judgment is “whether the plaintiff has provided evidence from which a rational trier of fact could infer that the employer’s stated reasons for taking the adverse action were lies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.