Robert Davis v. Wayne County Clerk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if “(1) the [Rule 60(b)] motion attacks a ‘defect in the integrity of the federal habeas proceeding,’ or (2) the motion attacks a procedural ruling which precluded a merits determination,” it should not be construed as a successive habeas petition
• finding jurisdiction to consider a Rule 60(b) motion that \attacks a procedural ruling which precluded a merits determination\
• “To ensure that habeas petitioners do not circumvent these statutory requirements by filing Rule 60(b
• “To ensure that habeas petitioners do not circumvent these statutory requirements by filing Rule 60(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).