Robert Dale Henderson v. Harry K. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that officer’s three separate attempts to clarify whether a defendant intended to cut off questioning did not violate the defendant’s constitutional rights
• “It does not make sense to apply the same time standard to situations in which the defendant controls the time period between the end of police questioning and the start of a defendant-initiated confession.”
• \It does not make sense to apply the same time standard to situations in which the defendant controls the time period between the end of police questioning and the start of a defendant-initiated confession.\
• “It does not make sense to apply the same time standard to situations in which the defendant controls the time period between the end of police questioning and the start of a defendant-initiated confession.”
• describing defendant’s post-Miranda “no comment” response as “equivocal”
• supp. op. on reh’g denied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).