Skip to main content
· 11/12/1997

Federal Case

Citations

  • 129 F.3d 1056
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8590
  • 28 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20233
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 13923
  • 45 ERC (BNA) 1827
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 31787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing district court’s grant of summary judgment for the insurer because liability potentially existed against the insured on the underlying claim for groundwater contamination
  • “In determining whether a duty to defend exists, courts look to all the facts available to the insurer at the time the insured tenders its claim for the defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.