Robert Crawford v. Carolyn W. Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that based on several discrepancies between the medical records and the claimant’s testimony, the ALJ correctly found allegations about the severity of his disability and the resulting impact was not credible
• finding the ALJ did not err in failing to rely on a medical opinion that was inconsistent with the plaintiff’s ability to perform normal daily activities
• ALJ may disbelieve claimant’s subjective reports due to “inherent inconsistencies or other circumstances” in the record.
• ALJ may disbelieve claimant’s subjective reports due to “inherent inconsistencies or other circumstances” in the record
• “[A]n ALJ may disbelieve a claimant’s subjective reports of pain because of inherent inconsistencies or other circumstances.” (internal quotation omitted)
• the Medical-Vocational Guidelines are used only “where an individual with a severe medically determinable physical or mental impairments(s) is not engaging in substantial gainful activity and the individual’s impairment(s

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).