Robert Consalvo v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “Petitioner’s Brady claim hangs on the existence of exculpatory evidence”
• “Determining the credibility of witnesses is the province and function of the state courts, not a federal court engaging in habeas review.”
• “Determining the credibility of witnesses is the province and function of the state courts, not a federal court engaging in habeas review.”
• “Determining the credibility of witnesses is the province and function of the state courts, not a federal court engaging in habeas review.”
• “Determining the credibility of witnesses is the province and function of the state courts, not a federal court engaging in habeas review.”
• “Determining the credibility of witnesses is the province and function of the state courts, not a federal court engaging in habeas review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).