Robert Clifton Johnson, Jr. v. Dr. Stuart Silvers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court “must allow a pro se litigant a reasonable opportunity to amend his pleadings to name the proper defendant”
• stating that the plaintiff had to show that the “defendant [had] required him to take anti-psychotic drugs without exercising professional judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).