Robert Caushi v. Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the IJ erred in finding the applicant’s evidence incredible without considering the applicant’s explanations for omissions and without specifying which answers given by the applicant’s sister undermined her credibility
• finding that “the violence, intimidation, and assassinations” directed at the petitioner’s political party contributed to his experience of past persecution
• explaining that although an IJ may consider evidence of country conditions not initially in the record, if the IJ does so, he must make that evidence part of the record
• “The BIA treats a motion to remand for the purpose of submitting additional evidence in the same manner as motions to reopen the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).