Robert Campbell v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “if counsel had ignored the defendant’s express instruction to file an appeal, such action amounts to a per se violation of the Sixth Amendment”
• observing that “if counsel had ignored the defendant’s express instruction to file an appeal, such action amounts to a per se violation of the Sixth Amendment”
• observing that “if counsel had ignored the defendant’s express instruction to file an appeal, such action amounts to a per se violation of the Sixth Amendment”
• observing that “if counsel had ignored the defendant’s express instruction to file an appeal, such action amounts to a per se violation of the Sixth Amendment” (internal quotation marks omitted
• observing that “if counsel had ignored the defendant’s express instruction to file an appeal, such action amounts to a per se violation of the Sixth Amendment” (internal quotation marks omitted
• holding a district court must provide an evidentiary hearing on disputed question of whether petitioner 1 Petitioner’s claim under Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), was denied on April 23, 2018. (D.E. 5.) directed defense counsel to file a notice of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).