Robert Campbell v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, because it is an affirmative defense, “the burden is on the defendant to show that the statute of limitations has run”
• explaining that the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense, and Athe burden is on the defendant to show that the statute of limitations has run.@
• explaining that once the defendant has shown that the statute of limitations has run, the burden shifts to plaintiff to establish an exception to the statute of limitations
• requiring, in FELA context, that plaintiff show entitlement to equitable tolling once defendant has demonstrated that statute has run
• “Because the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense, the burden is on the defendant to show that the statute of limitations has run.”
• “Because the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense, the burden is on the defendant to show that the statute of limitations has run.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).