Robert C. Summers, III v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant is not entitled to have his sentence revised when a trial court has “shown him leniency multiple times, with unsuccessful results”
• defendant’s sentence for cocaine possession found to be appropriate where defendant had been granted leniency in sentencing on previous occasions, without modification of behavior
• defendant’s sentence was not inappropriate given his poor character, the similarity of his prior convictions to the present offense, and his two failed attempts to maintain satisfactory probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).