Robert C. Kanuth, Jr. v. Prescott, Ball & Turben, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming arbitration award even though, “[i]n typical fashion, the panel did not explain how it derived the particular numbers associated with each element of the total damage award” and stating that “[o]f course, the panel is not required to give an explanation ...”
• “Courts have recognized that judicial review of arbitral awards is extremely limited.”
• “[C]ourts will not generally inquire into the basis of a lump-sum award' unless they believe that the arbitrators rendered it in ‘manifest disregard’ of the law or unless the facts of the case fail to support it.”
• discussing vacatur under the predecessor to 9 U.S.C. § 10(a)(4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).