Robert C. Bransford v. Robert Brown Dale Foltz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that it was sufficient for the district court, when adopting an R&R, to merely state that it made a de novo review of the record and of all objections to the magistrate’s findings and recommendations
• finding that it was sufficient for the district court, when adopting an R&R, to merely state that it made a de novo review of the record and of all objections to the magistrate’s findings and recommendations
• “Although this court recognizes the difficulty in demonstrating prejudice where the transcripts are missing, petitioner must present something more than gross speculation that the transcripts were requisite to a fair appeal.” (citations omitted)
• “[I]n order to demonstrate denial of a fair appeal, petitioner must show prejudice resulting from the missing transcripts.”
• “Any time a page is missing from a transcript we cannot assume that reversible error may have been reflected on that page, but rather some modicum of evidence must support such a conclusion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).