Robert Bye v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that notice provided to counsel and “acknowledged” reasonably “apprise[d] [a party] of the pendency of the administrative forfeiture proceeding and . . . afford[ed] him an opportunity to present his objections. Accordingly, he received due process.”
• pretrial detainee, whose attorney was served with notice and acknowledged its receipt, was sufficiently notified
• excessive force claim based on bumping, grabbing, elbowing and pushing failed to state Eighth Amendment violation where inmate alleged no pain or injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Davenport
  Eleventh Circuit· 2012-02-03· cited 50×
• Yeung Mung Weng v. United States
  Second Circuit· 1998-02-24· cited 47×
• Reed v. Medford Fire Department, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 2011-08-10· cited 33×
• Lopez, Ramon v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 2000-01-18· cited 14×
• United States v. $83,686.00 in United States Currency Seized From Suntrust Account No. 1000018120112
  District of Columbia· 2007-07-09· cited 5×
• Oyekoya v. United States
  S.D. New York· 2000-08-01· cited 4×
• Vereda, Ltda. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1998-08-13· cited 3×
• United States v. Lostia
  Sixth Circuit· 2001-06-12
• United States v. Burks
  Sixth Circuit· 2002-10-24
• Adams v. United States
  N.D. West Virginia· 2016-04-06

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
  Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
• Clara Torres v. $36,256.80 U.S. Currency
  Second Circuit· 1994-06-10· cited 109×