Robert Blake v. Sant Pallan v. Willie R. Barnes, Commissioner of Corporations of the State of California, Plaintiff-In-Intervention/appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state banking commissioner did not necessarily have a sufficient interest in the interpretation of state securities laws for purposes of intervention as of right
• holding that state banking commissioner did not necessarily have a sufficient interest in the interpretation of state securities laws for purposes of intervention as of right
• state securities commissioner does not have a sufficient interest in class action suit merely because the action contains some pendent state claims
• state securities commissioner does not have a sufficient interest in class action suit merely because the action contains some pendent state claims
• “The prevailing view of the federal courts is that the claims of permissive Rule 24(b) interveners must be supported by independent jurisdictional grounds.”
• “Mere inconvenience to the [intervenor] caused by requiring him to litigate separately is not the sort of adverse practical effect contemplated by Rule 24(a)(2).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).