Robert Blackburn v. Carolyn W. Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the claimant \bears the burden of establishing that he meets all the criteria\
• explaining that the claimant “bears the burden of establishing that he meets all the criteria”
• explaining that substantial evidence is “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind would find adequate to support the Commissioner’s conclusion”
• upholding ALJ’s finding that listing 12.04 was not met where there was no evidence that claimant had episodes of decompensation of requisite length and frequency
• upholding Commissioner’s decision of non-disablement based on evidence that VE stated the claimant could return to past work
• discounting non-treating source’s opinion regarding mental limitations because it was inconsistent with Plaintiff’s ability “to complete personal care and household tasks, and that the evidence showed that he appeared to do better when living alone”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).