· 11/18/1986
Robert Bevier and Annette Bevier v. Steven Hucal
Citations
- 806 F.2d 123
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34077
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the police “needed some evidence” of intent to establish probable cause under a statute proscribing knowing or willful conduct
- holding that the police “needed some evidence” of intent to establish probable cause under a statute proscribing knowing or willful conduct
- holding that an ʺofficer may not close her or his eyes to facts that would help clarify the circumstances of an arrestʺ
- holding that an ʺofficer may not close her or his eyes to facts that would help clarify the circumstances of an arrestʺ
- holding that officer had failed to investigate and establish an essential element of the charged crime prior to arrest and therefore lacked probable cause
- holding that the police “needed some evidence” of intent to establish probable cause under a statute proscribing knowing or willful conduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cummings, Flaum, East-Erbrook
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.