Skip to main content
· 11/18/1986

Robert Bevier and Annette Bevier v. Steven Hucal

Citations

  • 806 F.2d 123
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34077

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the police “needed some evidence” of intent to establish probable cause under a statute proscribing knowing or willful conduct
  • holding that the police “needed some evidence” of intent to establish probable cause under a statute proscribing knowing or willful conduct
  • holding that an ʺofficer may not close her or his eyes to facts that would help clarify the circumstances of an arrestʺ
  • holding that an ʺofficer may not close her or his eyes to facts that would help clarify the circumstances of an arrestʺ
  • holding that officer had failed to investigate and establish an essential element of the charged crime prior to arrest and therefore lacked probable cause
  • holding that the police “needed some evidence” of intent to establish probable cause under a statute proscribing knowing or willful conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Flaum, East-Erbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.