· 7/25/1988
Robert Anderson v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
Citations
- 852 F.2d 1008
- 11 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1200
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10330
- 47 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,165
- 47 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1463
- 1988 WL 79779
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling that Congress did not intend to require that every litigant make a timely filing before commencing an ADEA action in District Court
- holding that so long as there is an indication of an allegation of class-wide discrimination, notice may serve as a basis for suit by others who are similarly situated
- explaining that the charge is designed to afford the defendant notice of the allegations against it and to permit informal methods of conciliation by the EEOC
- “ADEA does not ... require that [the named] plaintiffs file a routine written consent whose only purpose is to notify the court and the defendants that the plaintiffs agree to participate in the lawsuit.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cummings, Easterbrook, Ripple
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.