Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 8/19/1987

Robert A. Prather v. John Rees, Warden

Citations

  • 822 F.2d 1418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a “habeas petitioner must present his claim to the state courts as a federal constitutional issue”
  • providing that the district court can and must raise the issue of whether a habeas petitioner properly exhausted his state court remedies sua sponte when it clearly appears that the petitioner did not present his habeas claims to the state courts
  • providing that the district court can and must raise the issue of whether a habeas petitioner properly exhausted his state court remedies sua sponte when it clearly appears that the petitioner did not present his habeas claims to the state courts
  • explaining why federal courts should raise exhaustion sua sponte before reviewing the merits of a § 2254 habeas petition
  • “Ordinarily, the state courts must have had the opportunity to pass on defendant’s claims of constitutional violations”
  • “Ordinarily, the state courts must have had the opportunity to pass on defendant’s claims of constitutional violations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Ryan, Enslen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.