Robert A. Perske v. Office of Personnel Management

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Merit Systems Protection Board’s finding lacked substantial evidence because contrary evidence in the record “overwhelm[ed]” the evidence that supported the Board’s finding
• holding that “if none of the named plaintiffs purporting to 26 represent a class establishes the requisite of a case or controversy with the defendants, none may 27 seek relief on behalf of himself or any other member of the class.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).