Robert A. Neinast v. Board of Trustees of the Columbus Metropolitan Library Larry D. Black Vonzell L. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• referring to the First Amendment right to receive information in public library books as a “fundamental right”
• upholding no-shoes policy because it avoided “tort claims brought by library patrons who were injured because they were barefoot”
• Library did not deprive patron of constitutional rights by requiring him to wear footwear

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).