Robert a Bussian James J Keating v. Rjr Nabisco Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that fiduciaries may not FPA managed the in-person meetings with union members.6 “rely blindly” on advice
• finding that although public notice was given of a proposed rulemaking, the notice did not focus on the issue involved in a DOL interpretive bulletin, which lacked the force of law, and was therefore not entitled to Chevron deference
• explaining that fiduciaries may not \rely blindly\ on advice
• explaining that fiduciaries may not “rely blindly” on advice
• The decision to terminate a plan is not covered by ERISA, but fiduciary’s acts in implementing the termination are covered.
• the duty of loyalty inquiry concerns “the extent to which the fiduciary’s conduct reflects a subordination of beneficiaries’ and participants’ interests to those of a third party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).