Sixth Circuit· 12/4/2001

Robert A. Buell v. Betty Mitchell, Warden

Citations

274 F.3d 337
2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 25916
2001 WL 1529624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “a petitioner cannot circumvent the exhaustion requirement by failing to comply with state procedural rules” (quoting Coleman v. Mitchell, 244 F.3d 533, 538 (6th Cir. 2001))
observing that “[electrocution has yet to be found cruel and unusual punishment by any American court” and stating that “[w]e decline to be the first”
observing that \[e]lectrocution has yet to be found cruel and unusual punishment by any American court\ and stating that \[w]e decline to be the first\
upholding similar, but more limited, instruction against challenge that mitigating factors were not appropriately defined
denying habeas relief where the trial court gave a jury instruction very similar to the one at issue in the instant case
denying habeas relief where the trial court gave a jury instruction very similar to the one at issue in the instant case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Siler, Daughtrey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

121 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

107 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.