Skip to main content
· 12/3/1998

Robert A. Bloomer, Jr. v. United States

Citations

  • 162 F.3d 187
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 30627
  • 1998 WL 835001

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that trial counsel’s raising such a claim involves an “inherent conflict of interest”
  • “Our cases require that except in highly unusual circumstances, the assertedly ineffective attorney should be afforded an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence, in the form of live testimony, affidavits, or briefs.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cardamone, Cabranes, Heaney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.