Roberson, Crystal Yvette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the immaterial variance doctrine to punishment enhancements alleged for purposes of habitual offender punishment under Section 12.42(d)
• jury’s findings sufficient to support enhancement even 13 though they apparently received faulty instructions about the alleged sequence of the convictions
• evidence sufficient to show habitual status despite fact that enhancement paragraphs alleged in wrong order
• approving citation to unpublished cases for comparative and illustrative purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).