Robbs v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the 20-day period it took to rule on a defendant’s motion to suppress was not attributable to the defendant because “[n]othing in the record show[ed] that []the filing of the motion [‘]necessitated a slow-down of the judicial process’” (quoting Stephens, 225 Va. at 233)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McCray v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-11-23· cited 31×
• Heath v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-04-11· cited 21×
• Lee Antonio Turner v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2017-08-08· cited 21×
• Pernell Jefferson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1996-12-31· cited 12×
• York Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. William A. Hazel, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1998-11-06· cited 7×
• Steven McCalla v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2026-05-12

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brown v. Lukhard
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1985-04-26· cited 189×
• Stephens v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1983-03-11· cited 57×