Skip to main content
· 6/10/2016

Robbins v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 650 F. App'x 37

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[n]othing in the text of § 21 1681b(b)(3)(A) excludes defendant, as a CRA, from its scope”
  • dismissing a § 1681n willfulness claim for failure to plead facts sufficient to state a plausible claim because defendant’s interpretation of the FRCA was not objectively unreasonable
  • “In the employment context, an adverse action is a denial of employment or any other decision for employment purposes that adversely affects any current or prospective employee.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Millett, Silberman, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.