· 6/10/2016
Robbins v. District of Columbia
Citations
- 650 F. App'x 37
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[n]othing in the text of § 21 1681b(b)(3)(A) excludes defendant, as a CRA, from its scope”
- dismissing a § 1681n willfulness claim for failure to plead facts sufficient to state a plausible claim because defendant’s interpretation of the FRCA was not objectively unreasonable
- “In the employment context, an adverse action is a denial of employment or any other decision for employment purposes that adversely affects any current or prospective employee.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Millett, Silberman, Tatel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.