Robbins Men's & Boys' Wear Corp. v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this court is “confined to review evidence that was available to the [ALJ], and to determine whether the decision of the [ALJ] is supported by substantial evidence.”
• holding that evidence of a later deterioration in the claimant’s condition is not material
• noting that “this court has previously held that subjective complaints of pain may support a claim for disability”
• noting that “this court has previously held that subjective complaints of pain may support a claim for disability”
• noting that “this court has previously held that subjective complaints of pain may support a claim for disability”
• noting that subjective complaints of pain may support a claim for disability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).