Robbin Skaggs, Individually, and as the Representative on Behalf of the Estate of Samantha Skaggs, and Walter Skaggs, Sr. v. 4907 Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ORS 138.105(5), with some exceptions, bars appellate review of challenges that seek to invalidate convictions based on guilty pleas
• vacating $490 “state obligation” and remanding for resentencing where court erred in imposing it outside the defendant’s presence
• observing that “[o]ur appellate review authority is controlled by statute”
• observing that “[o]ur appellate review authority is controlled by statute”
• “Unless otherwise provided, we have no authority to review on appeal challenges seeking to invalidate convictions based on pleas.”
• “[O]n appeal of a judgment of conviction resulting from a plea of guilty or no contest, ORS 138.105(5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).