Robb v. Crawford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that we review de novo the district court’s rulings on the scope of the attorney-client privilege because they involve “mixed questions of law and fact” and that the burden of persuasion is on the party seeking to establish that the privilege applies
• “[S]ince the adoption of the Federal Rules of Evidence, courts have uniformly held that federal common law of privilege, not state law applies.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).