Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 5/25/1994
Roark v. State
Citations
- 876 S.W.2d 596
- 46 Ark. App. 49
- 1994 Ark. App. LEXIS 249
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- due process not violated when the government’s promise of lenient treatment for the informant is not contingent on the defendant’s conviction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Pittman, Cooper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Farm Credit Midsouth, PCA v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2018-04-04· cited 15×
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1996-03-20· cited 11×
- Conway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1998-05-13· cited 9×
- Dickerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1995-11-15· cited 8×
- Kearse v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1999-02-24· cited 7×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1998-09-02· cited 7×
- Jacobs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1998-02-20· cited 5×
- Mullinax v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1996-05-01· cited 5×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1996-06-05· cited 5×
- Federick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2012-10-03· cited 4×
- Dean v. Colonia Underwriters InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1996-02-21· cited 4×
- Toya Boston v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2020-12-09· cited 3×
- Austin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2007-04-25· cited 2×
- Potter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2000-07-05· cited 2×
- David King v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2020-11-18· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.