Roaderick v. Lull Engineering Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an oral agreement providing for a minimum of two years’ employment is unenforceable under the statute of frauds
• holding that, under Minnesota law, quantum meruit claim survives even though statute of frauds excluded contract claim
• holding that even though statute of frauds excluded contract claim, quantum meruit claim remains
• indicating that the employee’s alleged oral contract called for a minimum of two years’ employment
• indicating that the employee's alleged oral contract called for a minimum of two years' employment
• noting that “contractual, as well as statutory, wage claims are governed by the 2-year limitation prescribed by [section] 541.07(5)” and concluding that, “based upon the broad definition of wages stated in [section 541.07(5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).