Skip to main content
· 3/24/1925

Road Dist. No. 4 of Shelby County v. Home Bank & Trust Co.

Citations

  • 5 F.2d 625
  • 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to expressly recognize an estoppel claim in the ERISA context but noting that one may be cognizable when the terms of the plan are ambiguous and the employer’s actions constitute “an interpretation of that ambiguity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clayton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.