· 3/24/1925
Road Dist. No. 4 of Shelby County v. Home Bank & Trust Co.
Citations
- 5 F.2d 625
- 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2735
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to expressly recognize an estoppel claim in the ERISA context but noting that one may be cognizable when the terms of the plan are ambiguous and the employer’s actions constitute “an interpretation of that ambiguity”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clayton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.