Roach v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Rule 9(a) “held not to be applicable to state habeas proceedings” in Kansas

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Perez, Ex Parte Alberto Giron
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-05-08· cited 193×
• State v. Sutphin
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-06-29· cited 91×
• Ferguson v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2003-11-12· cited 72×
• Woodberry v. State
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2004-02-13· cited 34×
• State v. Cribbs
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-11-09· cited 12×
• State v. Beeney
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2005-07-08· cited 1×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Nunn
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1989-01-20· cited 156×
• State v. Hall
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1990-05-31· cited 126×
• Paxton v. Ward
  Tenth Circuit· 1999-12-29· cited 95×
• McCray v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-10-09· cited 90×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1999-12-10· cited 69×
• Carmichael v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1994-04-15· cited 60×
• State v. Bishop
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1987-02-20· cited 46×
• State v. Micheaux
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1987-12-11· cited 35×
• State v. Switzer
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1989-03-03· cited 33×
• State v. Rasch
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1988-07-08· cited 33×
• Steele v. Guardianship & Conservatorship of Crist
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1992-10-30· cited 30×
• Wilson v. Hand
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1957-06-08· cited 15×
• Carmichael v. State
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1993-06-25· cited 8×
• Clency v. Nagle
  Eleventh Circuit· 1995-08-04· cited 6×
• Zapata v. State
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1989-12-01· cited 6×