Skip to main content
· 11/23/1994

Roach v. Crouch

Citations

  • 524 N.W.2d 400
  • 33 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1361
  • 1994 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 238
  • 1994 WL 659040

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating \application of the doctrine requires proof of an intentional attempt to mislead the court with the inconsistency\
  • stating “application of the doctrine requires proof of an intentional attempt to mislead the court with the inconsistency”
  • question of patent ownership is properly triable in state court
  • inconsistent positions allegedly asserted in federal and state court proceedings
  • patent ownership issue properly triable in state court
  • patent ownership issue properly triable in state court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Megiverin, Harris, Lavorato, Neuman, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.