· 11/23/1994
Roach v. Crouch
Citations
- 524 N.W.2d 400
- 33 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1361
- 1994 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 238
- 1994 WL 659040
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating \application of the doctrine requires proof of an intentional attempt to mislead the court with the inconsistency\
- stating “application of the doctrine requires proof of an intentional attempt to mislead the court with the inconsistency”
- question of patent ownership is properly triable in state court
- inconsistent positions allegedly asserted in federal and state court proceedings
- patent ownership issue properly triable in state court
- patent ownership issue properly triable in state court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Megiverin, Harris, Lavorato, Neuman, Ternus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.