Skip to main content
· 12/9/2015

Roach v. Brower

Citations

  • 180 So. 3d 1142
  • 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18383
  • 2015 WL 8291622

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that in order to be entitled to an injunction for stalking, the petitioner must allege and prove two separate instances of stalking
  • noting that “without competent, substantial evidence that Ms; Brow-er, the petitioner, suffered substantial emotional distress, the circuit court could not enter an injunction against [the appellant] based upon the stalking statute”
  • noting that “without 4 competent, substantial evidence that . . . the petitioner, suffered substantial emotional distress, the circuit court could not enter an injunction against [the appellant] based upon the stalking statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lucas, Altenbernd, Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.