ROACH, RICHARD, PEOPLE v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “while there was a roughly three-month gap between” the proceedings, there was “nothing in the trial court record that suggests any amelioration of Petitioner’s mental incompetence during that hiatus”
• where the California 8 Supreme Court denies a petition for discretionary review of a direct appeal decision 9 without comment, AEDPA review “focuses on the California Court of Appeal’s 10 reasoning in denying relief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).